Rep. John Larson, D-Conn., leaves the Capitol after the ultimate votes of the week on February 28, 2019.
invoice clark | CQ-Group Name Checklist | pretend pictures

At Tuesday’s occasion, Home Minority Chief Hakeem Jefferies, DN.Y., known as it a “harmful default sport” that might jeopardize the advantages of hundreds of thousands of retirees throughout the nation.
Social Safety already faces funding dangers
To keep away from a Social Safety funding shortfall, Democrats and Republicans in Congress should agree on an answer.
The most recent projections from the Social Safety Board of Trustees present that the belief fund used to pay retirees, in addition to their households and survivors, shall be depleted inside 10 years. At the moment, 77% of these advantages shall be paid.
When mixed with the belief fund used to pay incapacity advantages, the funds are projected to be depleted in 2034, when 80% of advantages can be paid.
The Social Safety Act 2100 that was launched within the final Congress had broad help amongst Home Democrats.
This tactic of holding the economic system hostage hurts older individuals essentially the most.
John Larson
Connecticut Democratic Consultant
The most recent model of the invoice shall be sponsored by Democratic Sens. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, Larson stated.
Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., reintroduced their very own Social Safety proposal earlier this 12 months, which additionally goals to extend advantages whereas extending this system’s solvency by means of tax the wealthy.
Up to now, Republican lawmakers haven’t proposed laws to handle Social Safety’s funding issues. Sen. Invoice Cassidy, R-Los Angeles, lately stated that he’s engaged on a bipartisan “large thought” to handle this system’s 75-year deficit.
“That is why we’re right here, to implore our fellow Republicans to work with us, signal our invoice or provide you with what they assume is a greater plan,” Larson stated.
Adjustments within the Social Safety Act 2100
zimmytws | iStock | pretend pictures
The Social Safety Legislation 2100 goals to increase the solvency of this system, though no estimates are but accessible on how lengthy funding for this system might lengthen. The most recent model of the invoice was anticipated to increase this system till 2038.
In distinction, the Sanders and Warren plan would lengthen solvency by means of 2096.
A key distinction between the 2 plans is how larger taxes have an effect on you. Sanders and Warren’s plan requires reapplying Social Safety payroll taxes for earnings over $250,000.
In contrast, Social Safety 2100 would apply these taxes to earnings over $400,000, in step with President Joe Biden’s promise to not elevate taxes for households with annual incomes under that threshold.
This 12 months, the utmost earnings topic to Social Safety payroll taxes are $160,200.
Social Safety 2100 additionally requires an extra 12.4% web funding earnings tax to be added for taxpayers incomes greater than $400,000.
Moreover, the invoice would introduce a lot of profit expansions.
The Social Safety Act 2100 would improve all advantages by 2% for the greater than 65 million beneficiaries of this system.
It additionally seeks to make advantages extra beneficiant for senior beneficiaries who’ve been receiving advantages for 15 years or extra, in addition to low-income seniors and widows and widowers from two-income households.
It might repeal guidelines that scale back advantages for some public staff and their spouses, often known as the Windfall Elimination Provision and Authorities Pension Compensation.
Congressman Larson provides a commonsense, honest, and forward-thinking plan to make sure that Social Safety’s sturdy 88-year promise continues to be fulfilled.
Max Richman
President and CEO of the Nationwide Committee to Protect Social Safety and Medicare
It might additionally improve entry to advantages for kids dwelling with grandparents or different kin, in addition to restore scholar advantages as much as age 26 for the youngsters of beneficiaries.
The invoice additionally requires altering the way in which annual cost-of-living changes are measured, amongst different modifications.
Social Safety advocates praised the reintroduction of the invoice.
“At a time when the Home majority has introduced the nation to the brink of default, which might have catastrophic penalties for seniors on fastened incomes, Congressman Larson provides a commonsense, honest, and forward-thinking plan. to make sure that the 88-year promise of Social Safety continues to be fulfilled,” stated Max Richtman, president and CEO of the Nationwide Committee to Protect Social Safety and Medicare, in an announcement.