Opinion | How the MCAT does — or doesn’t — have an effect on variety in medical faculties

Rate this post


As a medical scholar, I consider the concept that the MCAT offers undue benefits to White candidates is unfounded. Of their Dec. 9 Friday Opinion essay, “Medical faculties ought to de-emphasize standardized admissions exams,” Alessandro Hammond and Cameron Sabet omitted the MCAT common rating of Asians, which is the best of all racial teams, in all probability as a result of exhibiting that might discredit their argument.

We want a extra various workforce in drugs as a result of the concordance of doctor and affected person racial profile enhances affected person satisfaction and remedy end result. However the impediment to attain this objective will not be the MCAT. In the case of medical college admissions, comfortable elements equivalent to volunteering, analysis and entrepreneurship play an enormous position. College students with decrease incomes merely don’t have the time and money to take part in these actions.

Conversely, the MCAT is the one issue that permits the good and the motivated an opportunity to shine no matter their socioeconomic standing. The one factor you want, to be absolutely ready for the take a look at, is available on-line free of charge or for a small price. The MCAT selects candidates with psychological toughness and mental acuity to review drugs. And these two attributes lay the muse for turning into a superb doctor.

John H. Shen-Sampas, San Francisco

If knowledge had been made out there, related MCAT analysis would possible present, as SAT analysis has proven, that after college students’ parental training, household earnings and race are taken under consideration, the MCAT then provides little or no distinctive predictive worth to its restricted goal — serving to point out solely first-year grades in medical college. The MCAT, as with the SAT, in all probability is unfairly and numerically simply “laundering” these socioeconomic elements.

Additional, MCAT scores are weighted excessively. In 2017 and 2018, a whopping 83 p.c of coming into medical college students had top-third MCAT scores. So, greater than two-thirds of all candidates with out top-third scores had competed for a mere 17 p.c of these first-year seats. These knowledge present that typical holistic admissions processes, whereas contemplating a number of elements, have one predominant issue: MCAT scores. That is MCAT-driven, not holistic, admissions.

Medical faculties ought to observe almost the entire most selective faculties and lots of graduate departments — and develop into test-optional or test-free, to structurally de-emphasize the MCAT and improve variety.

Jay Rosner, Mill Valley, Calif.

The author is govt director of the Princeton Assessment Basis.

Source link