328 Gieswein denies that he was a Three Percenter as of January 6, 2021, although he affiliated with an obvious Three Percenter group at earlier instances. See Gieswein’s Movement for Listening to & Revocation of Detention Order at 23, 18-19, 25, United States v. Gieswein, No. 1:21-cr-24 (D.D.C. June 8, 2021), ECF No. 18. When the FBI arrested Gieswein, the prison grievance famous that he “seems to be affiliated with the novel militia group generally known as the Three Percenters.” Legal Grievance at 5, United States v. Gieswein, No. 1:21-cr-24 (D.D.C. Jan. 16, 2021), out there at https://www.justice.gov/opa/web page/file/1360831/obtain. See additionally Adam Rawnsley (@arawnsley), Twitter,
17, 2021 9:13 p.m. ET, out there at https://twitter.com/arawnsley/standing/1350989535954530315 (highlighting photographs of Gieswein flashing a Three Percenter image).
329 Second Superseding Indictment at 9-10, United States v. Nordean et al., No. 1:21-cr-175 (D.D.C. March 7, 2022),
ECF No. 305.
330 Assertion of Offense at 5, United States v. Bertino, No. 1:22-cr-329 (D.D.C. Oct. 6, 2022), ECF No. 5; Third Superseding Indictment at 6, United States v. Nordean, et al., No. 1:21-cr-175 (D.D.C. June 6, 2022), ECF No. 380; Assertion of Offense at 3, United States v. Donohoe, No. 1:21-cr-175 (D.D.C. Apr. 8, 2022), ECF No. 336.
331 Third Superseding Indictment at 13, United States v. Nordean, et al., No. 1:21-cr-175 (D.D.C. June 6, 2022), ECF No. 380; Georgia Wells, Rebecca Ballhaus, and Keach Hagey, “Proud Boys, Seizing Trump’s Name to Washington, Helped Lead Capitol Assault,” Wall Road Journal, (Jan.17, 2021), out there at https://www.wsj.com/articles/proudboys-seizing-trumps-call-to-washington-helped-lead-capitol-attack-11610911596.
332 Paperwork on file with the Choose Committee to Examine the January sixth Assault on the USA Capitol (Jay Thaxton Manufacturing), CTRL0000070865, (December 29, 2020, Telegram chat at 11:09 a.m. from Enrique Tarrio beneath the identify “HEIKA NOBLELEAD.”).
at
333 “Former Chief of Proud Boys Pleads Responsible to Seditious Conspiracy for Efforts to Cease Switch of Energy Following 2020 Presidential Election,” Division of Justice, (Oct. 6, 2022), out there https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-leader-proud-boys-pleads-guilty-seditious-conspiracy-efforts-stop-transferpower; “Chief of North Carolina Chapter of Proud Boys Pleads Responsible to Conspiracy and Assault Costs in Jan. 6 Capitol Breach,” Division of Justice, (Apr. 8, 2022), out there at https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/leader-northcarolina-chapter-proud-boys-pleads-guilty-conspiracy-and-assault-charges-jan-6.
334 Assertion of Offense at 2, United States v. Bertino, No. 1:22-cr-329 (D.D.C. Oct. 6, 2022), ECF No. 5. 335 Assertion of Offense at 4, United States v. Bertino, No. 1:22-cr-329 (D.D.C. Oct. 6, 2022), ECF No. 5. 336 Assertion of Offense at 4-5, United States v. Bertino, No. 1:22-cr-329 (D.D.C. Oct. 6, 2022), ECF No. 5. 337 Assertion of Offense at 4, United States v. Donohoe, No. 1:21-cr-175 (D.D.C. Apr. 8, 2022), ECF No. 336. Certainly, Proud Boys leaders Biggs and Nordean advised MOSD on January fifth a couple of plan they’d mentioned with Tarrio for January sixth. Though Biggs and Nordean didn’t share the plan’s exact particulars, Proud Boys like Bertino and Donohoe nonetheless understood the “goal in Washington, D.C., on January 6, 2021, was to hinder, impede, or intervene with the certification of the Electoral School vote, together with by pressure if obligatory,” and that the Proud Boys “would accomplish this via using pressure and violence, which might embody storming the Capitol via police strains and barricades if obligatory.” Assertion of Offense at 8, United States v. Bertino, No. 1:22-cr-329 (D.D.C. Oct. 6, 2022), ECF No. 5; Assertion of Offense at 6, United States v. Donohoe, No. 1:21-cr-175 (D.D.C. Apr. 8, 2022), ECF No. 336.
338 Superseding Indictment at 2-3, United States v. Rhodes et al, No. 1:22-cr-15 (D.D.C. June 22, 2022), ECF No. 167. 339 Caldwell testified that he was not an Oath Keeper. See Trial Transcript at 8778-79, United States v. Rhodes et al., No. 1:22-cr-15 (D.D.C. Nov. 15, 2022); Hannah Rabinowitz and Holmes Lybrand, “Capitol Riot Defendant Calls Himself a ‘Little Little bit of a Goof Relating to Pelosi and Pence Feedback,” CNN, (Nov. 15, 2022), out there at https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/15/politics/thomas-caldwell-testifies-oath-keeper-trial. As a result of the federal government tried Caldwell in a conspiracy case with identified Oath Keepers, the Choose Committee has referred to him as an Oath Keeper. 340 See Trial Transcript at 10502-08, United States v. Rhodes et al., No. 1:22-cr-15 (D.D.C. Nov. 29, 2022). 341 Trial Exhibit 6860 (1.S.656.9328 – 9396), United States v. Rhodes, No. 1:22-cr-15 (D.D.C. Oct. 13, 2022). 342 Superseding Indictment at 13, United States v. Rhodes, III, et al., No. 22-cr-15 (D.D.C. June 22, 2022), ECF No 167.
343 Superseding Indictment at 13-14, United States v. Rhodes, et al., No. 1:22-cr-15 (D.D.C. June 22, 2022), ECF No. 167.
344 Superseding Indictment at 15-17, United States v. Rhodes, et al., No. 22-cr-15 (D.D.C. June 22, 2022), ECF No 167.
345 Assertion of Offense at 5, United States v. Ulrich, No. 1:22-cr-15 (D.D.C. Apr. 29, 2022), ECF No. 117.
127
